Forward: 1) There is one thing that I have become convinced of, and that is the relationship between thinking and politics.
2) Why should we differentiate between the rare and the invisible? And why shouldn't thinkig be concerned not with describing the rare, but of thinking about the invisible?
We have been thinking of intelligence, lately, where we should be thinking of comfort. Comfort i that which we are used to, and therefore, not something associated intelligence, which we have come to associate with these rarer moments (evil, dust, insight). Comfort is the invisible, it is that which conforms, that which seems to do our bidding, that which is unremarkable. For instance, we possess a remarkable comfort with language and thinking. And, when we work, we feel at home in something, we feel comfortable with the land.
We hypothesize that the task of thinking is in fact to think about that which is invisible, in the sense of comfort.
1) First possibility: speech... tbc
Post a Comment